Saturday, February 13, 2016

The U.S. Supreme Court and Juvenile Criminal Justice

The United States Supreme Court continues to recognize the inherent differences between juvenile and adult criminal offenders, acknowledging that the former are less psychologically and socially developed—and thus less legally culpable—than the latter.

At the end of last month, the Supreme Court issued a decision in the matter of Montgomery v. Louisiana, a case with major implications for inmates sentenced as youth to life without the possibility of parole. In a nutshell, the Supreme Court ruled in Montgomery that juveniles who were previously sentenced to life without the possibility of parole should be granted a new sentencing or parole hearing.

In 2012, the Supreme Court held in Miller v. Alabama that it was unconstitutional to automatically sentence a juvenile convicted of homicide to life-without-parole. This decision essentially meant that any individual in prison who had been so sentenced was being held in violation of his constitutional right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment.

This legal predicament left many states wondering what to do about inmates who fit this criteria. Should they have to grant them a new sentencing or parole hearing? Was, in other words, the Miller decision retroactive to old cases or did only apply to new cases moving forward?

The Montgomery case answered just this question: juveniles who had previously been automatically sentenced to life-without-parole must be afforded a new sentencing or parole hearing. However, it does not mean that those inmates will be given a new sentence or granted parole, though that may be a possibility. Rather, Montgomery simply requires a new sentencing or parole hearing.

Since the Miller decision in 2012, California has already taken steps to address how it will address juvenile offenders sentenced to life-without-parole. In 2013, the state legislature passed a bill that permits an inmate so sentenced as a juvenile to a parole review after 15 years and release after 20 years.

This bill, titled “California Fair Sentencing for Youth,” required the state to give a new sentencing hearing to any inmate who was 18 years old or younger at the time they were convicted of a crime and sentenced to life-without-parole.

In light of Miller and last month’s decision in Montgomery v. Louisiana, the legal landscape of juvenile justice has changed dramatically for those sentenced to life without the possibility of parole for crimes committed as juveniles.

It remains to be seen whether the Supreme Court will eventually rule that all life sentences for crimes committed by juveniles are unconstitutional per se.

Katie Walsh is a defense attorney in Orange County, California. Attorney Walsh’s practice focuses on juvenile law, criminal defense, and victim’s rights.

Contact the Law Office of Katie Walsh at 714-619-9355 or online.


  1. Thank you for the article.
    I know that some cases are available for using data room virtual services in order to make all the process faster. I am just curious if this case can be available.

  2. Another crucial factor that you need to look into is the lawyer's experience in the criminal field. It is ok to ask how many criminal cases has the criminal lawyer handled, how many trials has the lawyer had.

  3. Might want to compliment the author for composing this perfect article
    Joseph Hayon

  4. I really appreciate the kind of topics you post here. Thanks for sharing us a great information that is actually helpful. Good day! Lawyers

  5. the mission of this background checking is basic, to offer the clients the best criminal information, the simplest requesting process, and the most nitty gritty criminal reports in a split background check site

  6. The educational domain names are highly regarded in the process of search engine optimisation. seaside nj attorney

  7. Can I merely say exactly what a relief to seek out somebody who actually knows what theyre discussing on-line. You definitely realize how to bring a difficulty to light and earn it critical. More people have to read this and see why side with the story. I cant believe youre no more well-liked simply because you absolutely have the gift. Elia & Ponto

  8. You are very cool! I dont suppose I have read something similar to this before. So nice to search out somebody with authentic applying for grants this subject. I really appreciate starting this up. Your website is one area that is needed on the net. Totally a helpful project for bringing new things for the web!

  9. A criminal lawyer is required to be specialized in handling different types of criminal defense attorney cases. The work of these lawyers integrates services that are provided to the people who seek professional legal support when they are accused with some crime. However, the basic purpose of using services of criminal lawyers is to get a lawyer for ourselves whose job is to argue for us to achieve success in the courtroom.

  10. Very Cool Lawyers blog and the great article about on Criminal Justice. Thanks author your Awesome Topic and outstanding Content. Really I got very effective information here and Looking forward to read your Upcoming post. Hayward immigration lawyers

  11. There are two comprehensive categories of law used in the United States legal system: civil law and criminal law. Toronto debt collection and recovery lawyer

  12. Use free online sources to find criminal records. When you know the recognizing data and the locale of the individual you're exploring, you can locate the suitable area, city, and state destinations to get to their open records.Dallas best defense attorney